Chibougamau Formation
Stratigraphic label: [ppro]cb
Map symbol: pPcb

First published: 14 March 2018
Last modified:








Translation of original French




Informal subdivision(s)
Numbering does not necessarily reflect the stratigraphic position.
Author:Long, 1974
Reference section:None
Type area:The most easily accessible outcrops are located in the northern portion of NTS sheet 32G16.
Geological province:Superior Province
Geological subdivision:Abitibi Subprovince
Lithology:Sedimentary rocks





Initially named the “Chibougamau series” by Mawdsley and Norman (1935), and later the “Chibougamau Group” by Riley and Kindle (1958), the Chibougamau Formation was established by Long (1974).

Long (1974) does not indicate a reference section. Outcrops at the top of Mount Bourbeau are easily accessible and expose both polymictic conglomerate and diamictite containing dropstones (NTS sheet 32G16, UTM NAD83, zone 18: 546845 mE, 5533120 mN). North of Waconichi Lake, a stripping called “Variété Univers” exposes a hillside outcrop showing polymicitc conglomerate with a matrix of arkose and light-grey to dark-grey clayslate (sheet 32J01, UTM NAD83, zone 18: 560381 mE, 5547485 mN).




The Chibougamau Formation is a sequence of Paleoproterozoic polymictic conglomerate, arkose and claystone. This unit was recognized from early geological work in the Chibougamau area and was quickly compared to Huronian sequences, particularly to the Gowganda Formation of southern Ontario (Faribault et al., 1912; Retty, 1930). The most common lithology is polymictic conglomerate with a matrix of arkose or light-grey to dark-grey clayslate. Rounded pebbles range in size from a few millimetres to >30 cm. They consist of intrusive rocks from neighbouring plutons and mafic to felsic volcanic rocks. Locally, hematite supergene alteration gives pebbles a pink colour. In the area of McKenzie Bay on Chibougamau Lake, there is a thin unit of grey arkose interbedded with the polymictic conglomerate sequence. Arkose has a series of fractures parallel to the McKenzie Shear Zone. This observation, in combination with the presence of fault gauge, supports Daigneault’s (1991) hypothesis that this structure has been reactivated in the brittle domain during the Proterozoic.

At the top of Mount Bourbeau, polymictic conglomerate alternates with finer beds of laminated and locally sorted arkose and mudrock. These laminated deposits (diamictites) are characterized by sedimentary structures (laminar flow, flame structure, synsedimentary normal fault) and contain dropstones, which imply a glaciogenic origin at the margin of a glacier that covered the southeastern Superior Province at the beginning of the Proterozoic (Long, 1974, 1981). In the Deux Orignaux Lake area, the Chibougamau Formation occurs as sandstone infills within NE to NNE-oriented fractures, which are described as clastic dykes by Chown and Gobeil (1990).



Thickness and Distribution

The Chibougamau Formation was recognized on the shoreline and the islands of Waconichi Lake (west side corresponding to the Gwillim Shear Zone wall) and Chibougamau Lake McKenzie Bay (west side corresponding to the McKenzie Shear Zone wall), as well as on some topographic peaks (Mount Bourbeau, north of North Lake and west of Antoinette Lake). In the Deux Orignaux Lake area, clastic dykes were observed on an outcrop of the Anville Pluton south of the Fardoche stock (southeast portion of sheet 32G14-200-0101). Four other outcrops with similar dykes line up in an NE-SW direction from east of Gribouille Lake in rocks of the Haüy Formation, to the east of Pacific Lake in rocks of the Cummings Intrusive Suite and Opémisca Pluton (northeast portion of sheet 32G14-200-0102). The distribution of remnants from the Chibougamau Formation suggests a much larger initial distribution (Long, 1974).




Stratigraphic Relationship(s)

Paleoproterozoic rocks of the Chibougamau Formation unconformably lie on Archaean rocks of the Abitibi and Opatica subprovinces. Rocks of the Mistassini Group, including the Témiscamie Formation having a minimum age of 1790 Ma (Fryer, 1972), come after those of the Chibougamau Formation. However, the two units are not in direct contact. 


Does not apply.


Author(s)TitleYear of PublicationHyperlink (EXAMINE or Other)
CHOWN, E.H. – GOBEIL, A.Clastic dykes of the Chibougamau Formation: distribution and origin. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences; volume 27, pages 1111-1114.1990Source
DAIGNEAULT, R.Évolution structurale du segment de roches vertes de Chibougamau, Sous-province archéenne de l’Abitibi, Québec. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; doctoral thesis, 352 pages.1991
FARIBAULT, E.R. – GWILLIM, J.C. – BARLOW, A.E.Rapport sur la géologie et les ressources minières de la région de Chibougamau. Ministère de la Colonisation, des Mines et des Pêcheries; AP 1912-01, 366 pages, 2 plans.1912AP 1912-01
FRYER, B.J.Age determinations in the Circum-Ungava Geosyncline and the evolution of Precambrian banded-iron-formations. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences; volume 9, pages 652-663.1972Source
LONG, D.G.F.Glacial and paraglacial genesis of conglomeratic rocks of the Chibougamau Formation (Aphebian), Chibougamau, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences; volume 11, pages 1236-1252.1974Source
LONG, D.G.F.Glacigenic rocks in the Early Proterozoic Chibougamau Formation of Northern Quebec. In Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record (Hambrey, M.J. and Harland, W.B., editors). Cambridge University Press; pages 817–820.1981
MAWDLSEY, J.B. – NORMAN, G.W.H.Chibougamau Area, Abitibi Territory, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada; Map 304A.1935Source
RETTY, J.A.Canton de McKenzie, région de Chibougamau. In Rapport annuel du service des mines de Québec pour l’année 1929 (Service des Mines de Québec, éditeur). Service des Mines, Québec; RASM 1929-D2, pages 50-87.1930RASM 1929-D2
KINDLE, E.D. – RILEY, G.C.Brock River, Abitibi and Mistassini Territories, and Abitibi County, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada; Map 1060A, 1 sheet.1958Source



12 septembre 2019