ABANDONED UNIT
Publication: 5 March 2020
DISCLAIMER: This English version is translated from the original French. In case of any discrepancy, the French version shall prevail.
Author(s): | Harrison, 1952 |
Age: | Paleoproterozoic |
Stratotype: | None |
Type area: | Schefferville area (NTS sheet 23J15) |
Geological province: | Churchill Province |
Geological subdivision: | New Quebec Orogen (Labrador Trough) / Hurst, Howse, Schefferville and Tamarack lithotectonic zones (according to the original description in the southern Labrador Trough) |
Lithology: | Volcano-sedimentary rocks and iron formation |
Category: | Lithostratigraphic |
Rank: | Group |
Status: | Formal |
Use: | Abandoned |
Background
The informal name Knob Lake group was proposed by Harrison (1952) to designate the entire sequence of predominantly sedimentary origin containing iron-bearing rocks of the southern part of the Labrador Trough (Burnt Creek strip area, sheet 23J). The name comes from a lake with a knob located near Schefferville. At that time, three other groups completed the Proterozoic succession in the Trough, namely the Howse, Murdock and Doublet groups (Harrison, 1952). These groups were higher in the stratigraphic column than the Knob Lake Group. In 1949, Labrador Mining and Exploration geologists divided the Knob Lake group sequence into three series called Hamilton River, Ferriman and Point. The usefulness of these terms could not be corroborated by Harrison (1952) following his work near Schefferville. In proposing the Knob Lake group name, Harrison (1952) was already considering eventually abandoning the name.
According to Harrison (1952), the Knob Lake group consisted of, from bottom to top, the following formations: Attikamagen, Denault, Fleming, Wishart, Ruth, Sokoman and Menihek. Frarey and Duffell (1964) added the Seward and Purdy formations to the group. Considered a formal designation, the Knob Lake Group now included the following revised list of formations from base to top: Seward, Attikamagen, Denault, Fleming, Wishart, Ruth, Sokoman, Purdy and Menihek. Frarey and Duffell (1964) and Baragar (1967) recognized the presence of the Knob Lake Group in the Wakuach Lake area (sheet 23O), north of the Schefferville area. Subsequently, Dimroth (1968, 1969, 1970, 1972, 1978) extended the distribution of the Knob Lake Group northward (to latitude 56° 30′ N) to include all predominantly sedimentary rocks stratigraphically underlying volcanic rocks of the Doublet Group. He divided the Knob Lake Group, from bottom to top, into four subgroups: Seward, Pistolet, Swampy Bay and Ferriman. Subsequently, Knob Lake Group formations were recognized between latitudes 56°30′N and 57°15′N by Dressler (1979), and between latitudes 57°15′N and 58°N by Clark (1977, 1978, 1979, 1980). In contrast, during the initial mapping work north of latitude 58°N, cartographers did not use the same stratigraphic nomenclature; consequently, the Knob Lake Group was not recognized in these areas (e.g. Bérard, 1965; Sauvé and Bergeon, 1965; Hardy, 1976). Following the recommendations of the North American Stratigraphic Code (NACSN, 1983), Clark and Wares (2004) elevated each of the subgroups to the rank of group, thus creating the Seward, Pistolet, Swampy Bay, Attikamagen, and Ferriman groups. At the same time, these authors recommended that the name Knob Lake Group be abandoned.
Reasons for Abandonment
The name Knob Lake Group became inappropriate following the discontinuation of the subgroups that comprised the Knob Lake Group (Dimroth, 1972, 1978), which were reclassified as groups (Clark and Wares, 2004). In addition, the part of the Knob Lake Group containing iron-bearing rocks was interpreted as the chronostratigraphic equivalent of part of the Doublet Group (see Le Gallais and Lavoie, 1982). For Clark and Wares (2004), it made more sense to give another group name to the restricted sequence of the second cycle containing these iron-bearing rocks. Thus, the sequence was named the Ferriman Group. The name Knob Lake Group was no longer useful and Clark and Wares (2004) recommended that it be abandoned.
References
Publications Available Through SIGÉOM Examine
BERARD, J. 1965. REGION DU LAC BERARD, NOUVEAU-QUEBEC. MRN. RG 111, 175 pages and 2 plans.
BERARD, J. 1965. BERARD LAKE AREA, NEW QUEBEC. MRN. RG 111(A), 148 pages and 2 plans.
BERGERON, R., SAUVE, P. 1965. REGION DES LACS GERIDO ET THEVENET, NOUVEAU-QUEBEC. MRN. RG 104, 141 pages and 3 plans.
BERGERON, R., SAUVE, P. 1965. GERIDO LAKE – THEVENET LAKE AREA, NEW QUEBEC. MRN. RG 104(A), 131 pages and 3 plans.
CLARK, T. 1977. GEOLOGY OF THE FORBES LAKE AREA (NOUVEAU-QUEBEC). MRN. DPV 452, 19 pages and 1 plan.
CLARK, T. 1978. REGION DU LAC HERODIER (NOUVEAU-QUEBEC) – RAPPORT PRELIMINAIRE. MRN. DPV 568, 48 pages and 2 plans.
CLARK, T. 1979. REGION DU LAC NAPIER (NOUVEAU-QUEBEC) – RAPPORT PRELIMINAIRE. MRN. DPV 663, 28 pages and 1 plan.
CLARK, T. 1980. REGION DE LA RIVIERE KOKSOAK (NOUVEAU-QUEBEC) – RAPPORT PRELIMINAIRE. MRN. DPV 781, 24 pages and 1 plan.
CLARK, T., WARES, R. 2004. SYNTHESE LITHOTECTONIQUE ET METALLOGENIQUE DE L’OROGENE DU NOUVEAU-QUEBEC (FOSSE DU LABRADOR). MRNFP. MM 2004-01, 182 pages and 1 plan.
DIMROTH, E. 1969. GEOLOGIE DE LA REGION DU LAC CASTIGNON, TERRITOIRE DU NOUVEAU-QUEBEC. MRN. RP 571, 62 pages and 7 plans.
DIMROTH, E. 1969. PRELIMINARY REPORT, GEOLOGY OF THE CASTIGNON LAKE AREA, NEW QUEBEC TERRITORY. MRN. RP 571(A), 58 pages and 7 plans.
DIMROTH, E. 1972. STRATIGRAPHY OF PART OF THE CENTRAL LABRADOR TROUGH. MRN. DP 154, 304 pages and 6 plans.
DIMROTH, E. 1978. REGION DE LA FOSSE DU LABRADOR ENTRE LES LATITUDES 54° 30′ ET 56° 30′. MRN. RG 193, 417 pages and 16 plans.
DRESSLER, B., CIESIELSKI, A. 1979. REGION DE LA FOSSE DU LABRADOR. MRN. RG 195, 136 pages and 14 plans.
HARDY, R. 1976. REGION DES LACS ROBERTS – DES CHEFS. MRN. RG 171, 109 pages and 2 plans.
Other Publications
BARAGAR, W.R.A. 1967. Wakuach Lake map-area, Quebec-Labrador (23 O). Geological Survey of Canada; Memoir 344, 174 pages. https://doi.org/10.4095/123960.
DIMROTH, E. 1968. The evolution of the central segment of the Labrador geosyncline, Part I: Stratigraphy, facies and paleogeography. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaeontologie, Abhandjungen, Stuttgart; volume 132, pages 22–54.
DIMROTH, E. 1970. Evolution of the Labrador Geosyncline. Geological Society of America Bulletin; volume 81, pages 2717-2742. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2717:EOTLG]2.0.CO;2.
FRAREY, M.J., DUFFELL, S. 1964. Revised stratigraphic nomenclature for the central part of the Labrador Trough. Geological Survey of Canada; Paper 64-25, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.4095/123909.
HARRISON, J.M. 1952. The Quebec-Labrador iron belt, Quebec and Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada; Paper 52-20, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.4095/123923.
LE GALLAIS, C.J., LAVOIE, S. 1982. Basin evolution of the Lower Proterozoic Kaniapiskau Supergroup, central Labrador Miogeocline (Trough), Quebec. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology; volume 30, pages 150-166. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/cspg/bcpg/article-abstract/30/2/150/57309.
NORTH AMERICAN COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE (NACSN), 1983. North American Stratigraphic Code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin; volume 67, pages 841-875. archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1982-83/data/pg/0067/0005/0800/0841.htm.
Suggested Citation
Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles (MERN). Knob Lake Group (abandoned). Quebec Stratigraphic Lexicon. https://gq.mines.gouv.qc.ca/lexique-stratigraphique/province-de-churchill/groupe-de-knob-lake_en [accessed Day Month Year].
Contributors
First publication |
Thomas Clark, P. Geo., Ph.D. (redaction) Mehdi A. Guemache, P. Geo., Ph.D. (coordination); Charles St-Hilaire, GIT, M.Sc. (critical review); Simon Auclair, P. Geo., M.Sc. (editing); Céline Dupuis, P. Geo., Ph.D. (English version); Nathalie Bouchard (HTML editing). |