Érasme Formation
Stratigraphic label: [marc]erm
Map symbol: mAerm

First published: 26 April 2018
Last modified: 11 juin 2019













Translation of original French






Informal subdivision(s)
Numbering does not necessarily reflect the stratigraphic position.
mAerm4 Ultramafic sill
mAerm3 Gabbro
mAerm2 Felsic and intermediate ash, lapilli and block tuff, rhyolite, rhyodacite and dacite
mAerm1 Amphibolitized pillow and massive flow basalt; minor amounts of felsic tuff and gabbro
mAerm1a Porphyritic basalt
Author: Beauchamp et al., 2018
Age: Mesoarchean
Reference section: None
Type area: Bohier Island region (NTS sheets 33A01 and 33A08)
Geological province: Superior Province
Geological subdivision: Opatica Subprovince
Lithology: Volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks
Type: Lithostratigraphic
Rank: Formation
Status: Formal
Use: Active





The felsic, mafic and ultramafic volcanic rocks of the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt were described in the works of Hocq (1985), Roy (1985, 1988), Couture (1986, 1987a, 1987b, 1987c, 1993) and Couture and Guha (1990). In this work, the authors included all of these rocks within the René Group. No formations had been individualized. Following mapping and geochronology work in the Bohier Island and Cadieux Lake areas, Beauchamp et al. (2018) and Beauchamp (2019) divided the René Group into four (4) formations, each corresponding to a volcanic event. The Érasme Formation was introduced to define the rocks belonging to the René Group first cycle (Mesoarchean age).



The Érasme Formation is the René Group’s oldest. It is divided into five (5) informal units. Unit mAerm1 consists mostly of basalt. The porphyritic basalt facies was individualized in the mAerm1a subunit. The basalts are interbedded with several horizons (<50m thick) of felsic and intermediate ash, lapilli and block tuff, and felsic volcanics (mAerm2). Unit mAerm3 includes the gabbros, while the mAerm4 unit represents the ultramafic Sills.

The volcanic sequence of the Érasme Formation is intruded by several types of dykes including porphyritic andesitic dykes, aphanitic felsic dykes, and felsic dykes with quartz eyes and plagioclase phenocrysts. In the Eastmain Mine area, porphyritic granodioritic dykes and sills were interpreted by Eastmain Resources (Frappier-Rivard 2015). These felsic intrusions, which were not observed during the Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles (MERN) mapping work, were intercepted in drilling (Frappier-Rivard, 2015).

The Érasme Formation hosts several gold deposits (Eastmain Mine – Zones A, B and C; Lac Julien; Hillhouse-Lac Julien-SE; Ola River) along the same stratigraphic horizon. These mineralizations are contained in a characteristic lithological package known as the “Mine Series package”. The Mine Series Package consists of a subplanar assemblage of felsic rocks (tuffs and flows), mafic flows, and altered and deformed ultramafic sills that dip 35° to the northeast (Frappier-Rivard 2015). The gold horizon is included in recrystallized and mineralized cherty horizons associated with massive to semi-massive sulphide lenses (pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite) and silicified zones in felsic, mafic and ultramafic rocks. The Mine Series Package, which was plotted laterally for 10 km in a NW-SE direction, is a marker level for gold mineralization in the Bohier Island area. 



Érasme Formation 1 (mAerm1): Amphibolitized Pillow and Massive Flow Basalt; Minor Amounts of Felsic Tuff and Gabbro

The mafic effusive rocks, which represent the dominant lithology of the Érasme Formation, have a dark-green colour in fresh exposure and altered patina. The mineralogical composition of these submarine lavas is relatively constant. They contain 50 to 80% green amphibole (hornblende and/or actinolite), 10 to 35% low to strongly damouritised plagioclase, 5 to 10% quartz, 5 to 10% epidote (pistachite, zoisite and clinozoisite) with varying amounts of sphene, biotite, muscovite, chlorite, calcite, zircon, magnetite, ilmenite and opaque minerals (including sulphides). Amphiboles are represented by hornblende, more rarely by actinolite. The more metamorphosed basalts contain hornblende porphyroblasts, commonly poeciloblastic, which are retrograded to epidote and chlorite. Actinolites are twinned and radial. Basalts are commonly cut by variously altered veins made of quartz, calcite, epidote, chlorite, amphibole and/or tourmaline. On the vertical gradient map of the residual total magnetic field, the majority of basalt flows are not magnetic, but some are. These magnetic flows, which form NNW-SSE to NW-SE oriented lineaments, define stratification. Basalts of the Érasme Formation have retained several primary volcanic structures. Pillows are well preserved and very common.

Peduncles, which are located at the base of the pillows, indicate a reverse stratigraphic polarity that is systematically oriented towards the SW or SSW in this unit. Pillows are commonly joint, flattened, and the edges are altered in carbonate, sericite and epidote. A few radial joints and quartz chambers filled with quartz are present in the pillows. Other volcanic structures, less common, are preserved in the mAerm1a unit: pillow breccias, massive flows and isolated pillows. Pillow breccias contain hyaloclastic material between fragments of pillows (Roy 1988). Massive flows have no volcanic structure and are difficult to distinguish from some gabbro outcrops. Some facies depicting unit mAerm1a basalt were not isolated as a geological area on the map. These are the amygdaloidal facies, the porphyritic facies and the brecciated facies that is fractured by hydrothermalism. The amygdaloidal facies is characterized by subrounded cavities, 0.1 to 0.5 cm, filled with alteration minerals. These amygdules, observed at the macroscopic and microscopic scale, are filled with epidote, calcite and sericite. The porphyritic facies is distinguished by the presence of 3-10% low to moderate damouritised plagioclase phenocrystals in a finer matrix. The brecciated facies fractured by hydrothermalism is characterized by the presence of 10 to 30% filled fractures. Some dark-green fractures are composed of hornblende that is coarser than the matrix. Other light fractures, white to beige, are filled with quartz ± epidote ± calcite.

Basalts of the Érasme Formation, especially those near and in the Mine Series Package, exhibit various hydrothermal alterations. The most common are silicification, chloritization, carbonatization, sericitization and biotitization. The 17-JM-6008 outcrop, which corresponds to the Susanna showing (Eastmain Resources), exhibits an area of intense and penetrative alteration within the mAerm1 unit. The outcrop shows a bleached pillow basalt, completely altered in silica, sericite, biotite and fuschite. There is also 25% low pinitised poeciloblastic cordierite in the edges and in the hearts of the pillows. This subalcaline basalt is characterized by an alteration rich in Si-Al-K-Cr which is typical of that observed near several metamorphosed massive volcanogenic sulphide gold deposits.

From a geochemical perspective, the diagram of Winchester and Floyd (1977) shows that the samples of mafic effusive rocks are located in the fields of andesitic basalt and subalkaline basalt (3-10 wt. % MgO). Some basalts are magnesian (10-12.5 wt. % MgO). They contain 47-58 wt. % SiO2, 3-12.5 wt. % MgO, 0.6-1.9 wt. % TiO2 and 38-136 ppm Zr. They are of tholeitic to transitional affinity. Tholeitic basalts are characterized by flat rare earth profiles (La/Yb = 0.7 to 2.2; gd/Yb = 1 to 1.3; normalised to Chrondrite CI; McDonnough and Sun, 1995) and Zr/Y ratios of 2.2 to 3.3. Transitional basalts have fractionated profiles showing light rare earths enrichment (La/Yb = 2.2 and 5.3; gd/Yb = 1.2 and 1.6) and have Zr/Y ratios between 4.1 and 5. Transitional basalts were only identified near the Tourigny Deformation Zone (1989) and Eastmain Mine mineralized corridor (Zones A, B, C). This subunit is not mappable in size at our work scale, but it seems to follow stratification and provides a reference horizon that is located within the structural roof of the Eastmain Mine mineralization. Discrimination diagrams of geotectonic environments indicate a formation environment similar to that of N-MORB and island-arc tholeites for tholeitic basalts. An E-MORB source is proposed for transitional basalts. The Pearce diagram (2008) and Nb-Ta anomalies on the spider diagram suggest that basalts of the Érasme Formation have undergone crustal contamination.

Érasme Formation 1a (mAerm1a): Porphyritic Basalt

A porphyritic basalt unit was identified by Eastmain Resources as a result of their surface mapping and drilling work (Frappier-Rivard 2015). This unit, which is a few centimetres to a few metres, was not observed during MERN mapping work in 2017. The porphyritic basalt is continuous for 4.5 km and extends from Hillhouse hill to Zone C of the Eastmain deposit. This unit, which contains about 10% tabular plagioclase, is considered a marker level. The porphyritic basalt is located in the structural wall of the “Mine Series Package”. Drilling sections conducted by Eastmain Resources show that the porphyritic basalt horizon dips 35° towards the NE, while the entire stratigraphy dips towards the NE at 45°. Frappier-Rivard (2015) suggests that the porphyritic basalt unit represents a late synvolcanic dyke, as it cuts volcanic stratigraphy, and occurs as xenoliths in felsic dykes.



Érasme Formation 2 (mAerm2): Felsic and Intermediate Ash, Lapilli and Block Tuff, Rhyolite, Rhyodacite and Dacite

The felsic and intermediate ash, lapilli and block tuffs and felsic volcanics (mAerm2) form thin bands (<50m) that are interbedded between mafic flows. These are units with several heterogeneities in the mineralogical composition of their matrix, and in the fragments they contain. The tuffs are bedded and show evidence of graded bedding.

The Hillhouse deposit (outcrop 17-JM-6010) shows the rapid succession of volcanoclastic facies. A semi-massive sulphide horizon (pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite), which is between 50 cm and 1 m, is located at the base of a horizon of intermediate to felsic fragmentary rocks. This horizon, which is an average of 15 m thick, is composed of a block tuff that moves to a lapillite tuff, an ash tuff, and then to a stratified ash and lapilli tuff. At the top of the stratigraphy is a massive fractured basalt of tholeitic affinity. The block tuff contains angular joint fragments of beige-white volcanic rock up to 30 cm, and some intermediate and mafic fragments containing sulphides.

Felsic volcanics are distinguished from volcaniclastic rocks by their lack of stratification and fragments. These rocks have a light grey shade are fine-grained, even aphanitic, and have conchoidal fractures. They are predominantly composed of quartz and plagioclase and show 2-5 % millimetric eyes of smoked quartz and varying amounts of biotite and muscovite.

The felsic to intermediate tuffs and volcanics of the Érasme Formation have a variable chemical composition, rhyolitic to andesitic, and calc-alkaline affinity. They are characterized by SiO2 contents of 55 to 78 wt. %, MgO of 0.2 to 6 wt. %, TiO2 of 0.1 to 1.1 wt. %, Zr of 13 to 32 ppm, and Zr/Y ratios of 4 to 21. The rocks in mAerm2 show fractionated profiles with light rare earth enrichment (La/Yb = 3 and 29; gd/Yb = 1.3 and 3.9). Low Eu/Eu* anomalies (0.4 to 1.3) are visible on rare earth profiles. The Spider diagram reveals negative anomalies in Nb, Ta and Ti.


Érasme Formation 3 (mAerm3): Gabbro

Gabbros form sills or dykes. They are generally slightly foliated and are medium-grained. Hornblende, damouritised plagioclase, epidote and sphene are the main components of this unit. Some amphiboles replace older pyroxene phenocrystals.


Érasme Formation 4 (mAerm4): Ultramafic Sill

Some ultramafic sills are interbedded in the stratigraphic sequence of the Érasme Formation. It is possible that the Érasme Formation also contains horizons of ultramafic volcanics (komatiitic lava), but no volcanic structure has been observed (neither in outcrop nor in thin section) to confirm this hypothesis. The deformation and weathering of these sills is such that the majority of the primary structures have been completely obliterated. Ultramafic rocks of the Érasme Formation are whitish to greenish-white in altered surface, and dark-green to blackish grey in fresh exposure. The rock is soft, foliated, very magnetic, homogeneous and fine to medium-grained. It consists of an assemblage of tremolite, talc and serpentine. It also contains carbonates, commonly associated with talc, and magnetite. Ultramafic sills are an important geological marker within the Mine Series Package as they are commonly located in the gold mineralization structural wall of  Eastmain Mine Zones A, B and C (Frappier-Rivard 2015).

Ultramafic sills of the Érasme Formation are characterized by SiO2 contents of 40-45 %, MgO contents of 20-26 %, TiO2 contents of 0.3-0.5%, Zr contents of 17-29 ppm, and Zr/Y ratios of 2.3-2.8. Their rare earth profiles are relatively flat as shown by their ratios La/Yb = 0.6 to 1.1 and gd/Yb = 1.1 to 1.2. These ultramafic rocks are in the field of non-aluminum-depleted komatiites (Sproule et al. 2002).

Thickness and Distribution

The Érasme Formation is present only in the southern branch of the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt. For the moment, the lithological and geochronological information does not allow to extend this formation to other branches of the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt. The Érasme Formation has a true thickness ranging from 1 to 2 km and is continuous for 25 km. The northern end of this stratigraphic unit is masked and intruded by the Bohier Island Pluton. To the south, the Érasme Formation is disappearing at the discordance that borders the Otish Basin. 


The dated sample is from a trench stripped in 2016 by Eastmain Resources (outcrop 17-JM-6010). The trench name is EM16-H2 and it corresponds to the Hillhouse gold deposit. The stripping is located in the southern branch of the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt, a few kilometres northwest of the Eastmain Mine. The Hillhouse deposit includes a mineralized zone. It is a recrystallized siliceous and sulphide chert (pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite) that is placed in contact with a transitional pillow basalt and an intermediate to felsic fragmentary sequence. The lithology sampled for dating is an ash and lapilli felsic tuff located in the structural wall (stratigraphic top) of the mineralized zone. The fragments are mostly felsic, few mafic (gabbroic and/or basaltic). In felsic fragments, up to 3% of quartz phenocrystals are visible. The age of the felsic tuff of the Érasme Formation yielded an age of 2800 ±6 Ma, that is, Mesoarchean. 

Isotopic System Mineral Crystallization Age (Ma) (+) (-) Inherited Age (Ma) (+) (-) Metamorphic Age (Ma) (+) (-) Reference(s)
U-Pb Zircon 2800 6 6             Davis and Sutcliffe, 2018b

Stratigraphic Relationship(s)

The Érasme Formation is part of the René Group. It corresponds to the first volcanic event of the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt. The Érasme Formation is older than the Roman Formation (2770 ±3 Ma, Davis and Sutcliffe, 2018b; 2770 ±6 Ma, Davis and Sutcliffe, 2018a), Clément Formation (<2770 Ma) and Dolent Formation (2751 ±5 Ma; Davis, personal communication, 2019). Contact between the Érasme and Roman formations was not observed in the field. A pause in volcanism or a fault could explain the difference of 30 Ma between the emplacement of the Érasme and Roman formations.

The Bohier Island Pluton (2771 ±6 Ma; Davis and Sutcliffe, 2018b), which is synvolcanic and contemporary to the emplacement of the Roman Formation, clearly cuts the Érasme Formation. The Chiyaaskw Pluton, younger than rocks of the Érasme Formation, intruded the latter. Dioritic rocks of unit nAchw2 locally contain elongated xenoliths, centimetric to metric, of deformed amphibolite and iron formation, which are significantly more abundant near contact with rocks of the Érasme Formation. Foliated diorites of the Gaël Intrusive Suite form small, intrusive masses that also cut rocks of the Érasme Formation. Highly chloritized volcanic rock xenoliths, associated with the mAerm1 unit, are present in diorites of the Gaël Intrusive Suite.

Finally, small intrusions in the form of sills or dykes cut volcanic rocks of the Érasme Formation. These intrusions are represented by felsic and intermediate porphyric rocks, aphanitic felsic dykes, and felsic dykes with quartz eyes and plagioclase phenocrystals.



Does not apply.


Author(s) Title Year of Publication Hyperlink (EXAMINE or Other)
BEAUCHAMP, A.-M. – MASSEI, F. – DAOUDENE, Y. Géologie de la région de l’île Bohier, au contact entre les sous-provinces d’Opatica, d’Opinaca et le Bassin d’Otish, au nord de Mistissini, Municipalité Eeyou Istchee Baie-James, Québec, Canada. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles, Québec. 2018 BG 2018-02
BEAUCHAMP, A.-M. Géologie de la région du lac Cadieux, sous-provinces d’Opatica et d’Opinaca, Eeyou Istchee Baie-James, Québec, Canada. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles, Québec. 2019 BG 2019-02
COUTURE, J.-F. Géologie de la partie occidentale de la bande volcano-sédimentaire de la rivière Eastmain supérieure. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources du Québec; DV 87-05, 5 plans. 1986 DV 87-05
COUTURE, J.-F. Géologie de la partie occidentale de la bande volcanosédimentaire de la rivière Eastmain Supérieure – Rapport intérimaire. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources, Québec; MB 87-51, 77 pages. 1987a MB 87-51
COUTURE, J.-F. Géologie de la partie orientale de la bande de roches vertes de la rivière Eastmain supérieure. Ministère de l’Energie et des Ressources du Québec, Rapport d’activités 1987; DV 87-24, page 48. 1987b DV 87-24
COUTURE, J.-F. Géologie de la bande volcano-sédimentaire de la rivière Eastmain supérieure. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources du Québec; DV 87-25, pages 115-118. 1987c DV 87-25
COUTURE J.-F. – GUHA, J. Relative timing of emplacement of an Archean lode-gold deposit in an amphibolite terrane: the Eastmain River deposit, northern Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences; volume 27, pages 1621-1636. 1990 Source
COUTURE, J.-F. Géologie et gîtologie du gisement de la Rivière Eastmain, Ungava, Québec. Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 286 pages. 1993 Source
DAVIS, D.W. – SUTCLIFFE, C.N. Geochronology of Zircon and Monazite by LA-ICPMS in samples from northern Quebec. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, 54 pages. 2018a MB 2018-18
DAVIS, D.W. – SUTCLIFFE, C.N. U-Pb Geochronology of Zircon and Monazite by LA-ICPMS in Samples from Northern Quebec. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO 113 pages. 2018b MB 2019-01
FRAPPIER-RIVARD, D. Technical report and recommendations, summer 2013-2014, Exploration program for Eastmain Resources Inc., National Instrument 43-101, rapport statutaire déposé au ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles, Québec; GM 69062, 1293 pages, 3 plans. 2015 GM 69062
HOCQ, M. Géologie de la région des lacs Campan et Cadieux, Territoire-du-Nouveau-Québec. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources, Québec; ET 83-05, 188 pages, 4 plans. 1985 ET 83-05
HOFFMAN, P.F. United Plates of America, the Birth of a Craton: Early Proterozoic assembly and growth of Proto-Laurentia. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences; Volume 16, pages 543-603. 1988 Source
MCDONOUGH, W.F. –  SUN, S.-S. The composition of the Earth. Chemical Geology; Volume 120, pages 223-253. 1995 Source
ROSS, P.-S. – BÉDARD, J.H. Magmatic affinity of modern and ancient subalkaline volcanic rocks determined from trace-element discriminant diagrams. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences; volume 46, number 11, pages 823-839. 2009 Source
ROY, C. Projet du lac Wahemen (Rivière Eastmain). Dans : Rapports d’activité 85. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources, Québec; DV 85-12, page 31. 1985 DV 85-12
ROY, C. Géologie du secteur de l’Île Bohier de la bande volcanosédimentaire de la rivière Eastmain Supérieure. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources, Québec; MB 88-16, 74 pages. 1988 MB 88-16
SPROULE, R.A. –  LESHER, C.M. –  AYER, J.A. –  THURSTON, P.C. –  HERZBERG, C.T. Spatial and temporal variations in the geochemistry of komatiites and komatiitic basalts in the Abitibi greenstone belt. Precambrian Research; volume 115, pages 153-186. 2002
TALLA TAKAM, F. – BEAUCHAMP, A.-M. – MASSEI, F. Géologie de la région des lacs Emmanuel et Léran. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles, Québec. In preparation
TOURIGNY, G. Reconnaissance structural analysis of the Eastmain River gold deposit, Mistassini Territory, Quebec. Rapport préparé pour Placer-Dome Inc. et Resources MSV Itée. IREM-MERI, Montréal, Québec, 58 pages. 1989
WINCHESTER, J.A. – FLOYD, P.A. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements. Chemical Geology; volume 20, pages 325-343. 1977 Source
PEARCE, J.A. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust. Lithos; volume 100 (1-4), pages 14-48. 2008 Source







19 octobre 2018